Seminars

Musical culture serves as a lens through which we can view the vast demographic, religious, social, and political transformations that took place during the Period of Division (220-589 CE). Over these nearly four centuries, diverse musical pieces, theories, instruments, and customs flourished, influenced both by internal non-Han cultures and external channels such as the Silk Road. These changes reshaped musical ensembles, sonority, iconography, and philosophies. At the same time, traditional debates, rooted in the intellectual traditions of dynastic solidification through the cultural pillars of music and ritual, continued in the vein of their Han predecessors. These debates now bore the burden of signaling stability amidst a precarious environment. This lecture will argue that debates over court music extended beyond a mere selection of pieces or ensembles; experts employed music theory to reflect the political ideologies they supported. I will focus on a significant dispute within the Northern Zhou (557-581 CE) regarding the number and arrangement of ritual bells. This debate marked a moment of transformation where the old became new, and the new became old. This discussion is particularly intriguing given the current lack of archaeological evidence of large bells from the Period of Division.

Commonly known as the patriarchal family structure, the aristocratic society of the Western Zhou dynasty was composed of many families that originated from the royal house and the heirs of other early founders. With the increasing discovery of bronze inscriptions and cemeteries, some details have come to contradict what researchers previously understood about the principles governing aristocratic lineages and families. The naming conventions of sons—often referred to and distinguished by Bo, Zhong, Shu, and Ji—did not always correspond to their familial status. This talk will examine the practices of addressing fathers and ancestors in worship, as well as the patterns of lineage cemeteries, to explore the potential variations in lineage structures that supported the royal house and the political arena during the Western Zhou period, alongside its chronological transformations.

In this talk, drawing on a chapter from my current book project, I argue that a common goal of various philosophies of governance in early China was the elimination of luck and favor (xing 幸). This concern for the elimination of luck was a relatively straightforward statement of a widespread notion of what we might call “justice”: people should get what they deserve. That is, people should not be shown any special favor and their ability to game their luck or curry such favor through various sorts of machinations should be limited to the greatest degree possible. As an ideal, this is not much contested in early sources. How to achieve the ideal was, of course, hotly contested. While we see few texts that openly advertise giving people what they do not deserve, we do see imperial practices and rhetorical gestures that implicitly mark the importance of favor. For the purposes of this talk, I want to focus on the claims that good rule requires the elimination of luck and favor. I also examine the way so-called undeserved favors were institutionalized and the different ways in which people came to think about and criticize these institutions and practices.

Yao, Shun, and Yu have long been revered as the quintessential sage kings, not only in China but also throughout premodern East Asia, including Korea and Japan. This study examines the process by which the cultural memory of these sage kings was established in Shanxi from the Warring States period to the 19th century. Shanxi, known as a historical stage of Yao, Shun, and Yu, preserves the most significant traces of their legacy. I begin by analyzing pre-Qin texts to explore how the cultural memory of Yao, Shun, and Yu emerged in the region. Then, I focus on the historical sites associated with these sage kings as recorded in major geographical texts. This examination will reveal the fluidity of cultural memory, “an ongoing, ever-evolving process of renewed acts of both erasure and remembrance.”